This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 628–648, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.59
Figure 1: Distinctive features of plasmonics contributing to improved photocatalyst performance.
Figure 2: (a) Representation of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) evolution in a noble metal particl...
Figure 3: The metallic equivalent resonant wavelength for 10 nm diameter nanoparticles. Reprinted with permis...
Figure 4: Pictorial representation of the localized surface plasmon resonance principle. Reprinted with permi...
Figure 5: Schematic of the Schottky junction mechanism. Reprinted with permission from [35], copyright 2014 Royal...
Figure 6: Synthesis of Pd/TiO2 photocatalyst via sunlight-assisted photodeposition [50].
Figure 7: Schematic of Au/AgBr-Ag heterostructure mechanism for improved photocatalytic performance. (a) Semi...
Figure 8: Photodegradation of GO in the presence of an electron donor (Ag NPs). Reprinted with permission fro...
Figure 9: (a) Pure metal nanoparticles (NPs) without any semiconductor. (b) Metal NPs partially embedded into...
Figure 10: High-resolution X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HR-XAS) experiment used to determine the changes in ...
Figure 11: Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROSs) in the photocatalytic reduction and oxidation of O2 an...
Figure 12: Plausible structural formation of adsorbed H2O2 on TiO2 surface (a) end-on (b) bridged and (c) side...
Figure 13: Reactions involved in the detection method of H2O2 with fluorescence probes (a) p-hydroxyphenylacet...
Figure 14: (a) Reaction of HTMP to TEMPOL. Reprinted with permission from [115], copyright 2017 American Chemical S...
Figure 15: (a) Laser-induced fluorescence detection of •OH released from an irradiated TiO2 surface. Reprinted...
Figure 16: Reaction routes for detection of •OH radicals with a DMPO spin-trapping reagent. Reactions with •OH...
Figure 17: (a) Usage of fluorescence probe HPF to detect •OH radicals. (b) Experimental setup for the single-m...
Figure 18: (a) Reactions involved in the detection of •O2− with DMPO. (b) Chemical structures of the spin-trap...
Figure 19: (a) FDTD simulation set up for Cu7S4. (b–d) 2D contour map of the electric field intensities around...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 353–363, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.35
Figure 1: Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of (a) g-C3N4, (b) CD/g-C3N4(0.1), (c) C...
Figure 2: (a) XRD patterns and (b) FTIR spectra of g-C3N4, CD/g-C3N4(0.1), CD/g-C3N4(0.2), and CD/g-C3N4(0.5)....
Figure 3: (a) The absorption spectrum of carbon dots (CDs) solution. The inset shows the fluorescence of the ...
Figure 4: X-rat photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of (a) C 1s (b) N 1s, (c) O 1s for CD/g-C3N4(0.5), and (d) C...
Figure 5: (a) Photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A (BPA) as a function time under irradiation of natural...
Figure 6: Electron transfer mechanism of CD/g-C3N4.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 428–437, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.43
Figure 1: Schematic diagram for the synthesis of Pd/TiO2 trough solar-assisted photodeposition.
Figure 2: FESEM images of a) low magnification, b,c) high magnification of 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2. The inset of c) ...
Figure 3: X-ray diffraction patterns of a) TiO2, b) 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2, c) 1.0 wt % Pd/TiO2 and d) 3.0 wt % Pd/...
Figure 4: Raman spectra of a) TiO2, b) 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2, c) 1.0 wt % Pd/TiO2 and d) 3.0 wt % Pd/TiO2.
Figure 5: Adsorption–desorption isotherm of 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2 and the inset is the pore size distribution.
Figure 6: Core level XPS spectra of a) Ti 2p and b) Pd 3d of 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2.
Figure 7: UV–vis absorption spectra of a) TiO2, b) 3.0 wt % Pd/TiO2, c) 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2 and d) 1.0 wt % Pd/T...
Figure 8: Photoluminescence spectra of a) TiO2, b) 0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2, c) 3.0 wt % Pd/TiO2 and d) 1.0 wt % Pd/T...
Figure 9: Photocatalytic degradation rates of AMX under visible light irradiation.
Figure 10: Schematic diagram of electron transfer and degradation mechanism of AMX.
Figure 11: Recycled photocatalytic degradation rates of AMX (0.5 wt % Pd/TiO2).
Figure 12: The kinetics of AMX degradation by prepared TiO2 and various Pd loading photocatalysts.